Thursday, April 28, 2011

Alternative Transportation and Considerations of Inequality

Attempting to change the car dependent culture on Occidental’s campus must parallel the challenges with urban developers face in planning a city that is socially, economically, and resourcefully egalitarian. In terms of transportation, urban planners face the challenges of economically developing transportation infrastructure that can be maintained, without sacrificing convenience of use, accessibility, and placement. For a city as vast and sprawling as Los Angeles, these decisions are especially delicate in that transportation is the life-blood of the city, giving people access to jobs and resources and linking communities together. Car culture is so deeply engrained by this reality; Los Angeles grew to the extent to that cars have become a necessity, and cars eventually began to define how this growth would continue.

In understanding this development, we can’t really blame Occidental students with cars to be car dependent (in a survey conducted by Professor Ashenmiller, it was found that most student driving is done within three miles of campus). Even non-Angeleno students perceive this city as infamous for its highways, traffic, and smog, but perhaps choose Occidental because of its proud status as an inner-city institution. And accessing the city and building a relationship with its different faces is certainly one of the strongest pedagogical resources Occidental has going for it, giving many students that come from a privileged or sheltered lifestyle a perspective of the world through less of a rosy-colored lens. Although I have discovered this way too late, recent excursions Downtown, the Westside, and Hollywood have exposed me to the ways in which LA is a living, breathing city, each neighborhood extremely unique and distinct, yet every bit of vital to the city as the organs of a body. But it is important to note that this realization was not done through the removed, celestial freeways, but rather on the bus and the rail, infrastructure that is very much grounded…

Learning to substitute this car culture for more sustainable, alternative ways of transportation absolutely depends on people challenging their phobia of interacting and sharing spaces with different communities. While Los Angeles is following suit as a global city in planning and implementing alternative forms of transportation infrastructure, like Bagota, Curitiba, and Copenhagen, this work must be done with the social factors kept in mind. While the average rail rider in Los Angeles is a white, upper- middle-class professional that possesses a car, but receives a subsidize rail pass, 94 percent of public transportation is utilized by people of color and working class backgrounds riding the bus. Meanwhile, bus infrastructure receives a great degree less support than rail, which is partly already supported and feasible because of limited access in only the areas that have the tax base to support such infrastructure. Despite the obvious inequality, there is also a distinct social problem with this situation, reinforcing the racial and class segregation white flight has already perpetuated in the city. Public transportation not only can be space for people of color and white people to interact, but to educate one another about the different struggles they face within their community. Political engagement becomes an outcome of mere exposure to how “the other half live,” working to remedy not just neglect common in an urban environment, but to enlighten the ignorant or unknowing.

I guess the take away would be this: car culture is an inevitability considering the historical development of a city like Los Angeles. But in seeking to change this reality, we are given a unique opportunity to reconcile several more pervasive social ills in our society. Even in choosing to rely on alternative, more sustainable forms of transportation, I implore Occidental students to embrace their liberal education to even be critical of the reasons how and why not only sustainable transportation, but sustainable culture in general is impacting or neglecting social disparities. Ask why bike lanes are just only recently being embraced when poor folks have relied on bikes for so long… Consider what the economic consequences of public transportation ridership changing or expanding, and what this means for the poor… More than anything, make the effort and take the initiative to move past yourself on public transit, and be open to drink in the different worlds around you—the beauty, the injustices, and the tenacity of life within their own spheres.

Thursday, April 7, 2011

Implementing a Parking Fee

When Kelsey, Dmitri and I began brainstorming our project for implementing a parking fee and using part of the revenue generated to further subsidize metro passes for Oxy students I thought it was a relatively straight forward project. I was told that the President backed the idea and I thought to myself that this project would be easy and we would have it up and running in no time, especially considering most colleges have such a system already in place. Much to my surprise, we found out that implementing a parking fee required a new full-time campus safety officer as well as thousands of dollars for signage. We managed to circumvent the large expense of an additional officer by proposing a new student employment position. Then we tried to set up a meeting with President Veitch, which was unsuccessful. Recently, we have been trying to coordinate a meeting with all of the various department heads that have an interest or say in the project, which is a surprisingly large group. This project, although I am confident we will accomplish our goals, has demonstrated to me the increased time and difficulty that having a bureaucratic system implies. There are many levels that have to give their input and have a say as to how someting will be completed. This is both an advantage and disadvantage to our system, hopefully everyone's interests are accounted for to minimize the possibility of a negative outcome for a certain group. Yet I now understand the difficulty of pursuing change because what we are all experiencing with our individual projects are a mere microcosm of what happens in Washington and all over the world every day.

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

Making Move-Outs Better for the Environment and Society

While trying to develop our own Sustainable Move-out program for Occidental, my team and I looked at other schools for inspiration on how to successfully implement the program. While we were unable to find many concrete logistical information about these programs, the other university programs did show us that such programs can have extremely beneficial results on campus and within the community. Suffolk University developed its, Dump and Run Program, and 2.5 tons of goods avoided landfills and ended up in the hands of 64 needy individuals. Many other universities have similar programs and have teamed up with a variety of non-profits to make sure that clothes, furniture, and food are donated properly at the end of the semester. We are quite excited that the logistical details of our project our beginning to take form. First, we met with Juls, the head of res-life to determine if we could involve Res-Life in the project. With her approval of our current plan, we are well on our way to creating Oxy’s first program of this kind. We are still coordinating details with campus safety, and determining our donation partners, but these matters should be fairly easy to figure out. The biggest obstacle for our group is finding enough volunteers to man all of the dorms at the end of the semester when many students have already left, or are working on moving themselves out of the dorms. We plan on heavily promoting this opportunity through flyers, oxy digest posts, contacting the UEP list serve, and recruiting students at Earth day. Hopefully, we will be able to get enough volunteers to successfully implement Sustainable Move-out at the end of this semester.

Thursday, March 31, 2011

An update on green transportation

A key component of our Green Transportation proposal is the implementation of a parking fee on the Occidental College campus. This has the potential to be a very controversial proposal, and has many components that make it so. The purpose of the parking fee would ultimately be to reduce the number of students who brought cars to campus, and in doing so increase the use of public transportation within Los Angeles.

Los Angeles has always been a car-centric city, therefore facilitating the best experience of the city is done through the car . Sitting on the freeway alone in your car, with thousands of other people also alone in their cars, at an almost dead stop for hours is an experience that you can get in few other places. But it's more than that, the freeways in LA have become the city's bloodlines. As Reyner Banham writes, for LA the space of the freeway is an entirely separate ecology- it has its own characteristics, as do the actions of those within its space.

So the question then becomes, what does it mean to change this model? What does it mean for LA to be experienced through public transportation instead of the private automobile? Public transportation opens up a whole different side of the city. It means exposure to more neighborhoods, the potential for interactions with more people. It means moving out of the private space of the car, and moving into the public space of the city. It means truly integrating into the city, and finding a sense of place through movement within it. In a city as rich as Los Angeles, using public transportation is not shorting out on the experience of the city, but it is in fact enhancing it- something that should be especially valued by the college community.

The implementation of a parking fee on campus is a sign of changing times, and of a changing city experience. It may be hard to culturally and socially adapt to that change, but it doesn't add up to a less complete experience. The parking fee in combination with subsidized public transportation would facilitate this changing city experience, while at the same time encouraging the transition to a more green campus and sustainable future.

Lighting Data Update

Today Brian and I received great news that our lighting modules have arrived. We will now be contacting facilities and letting them know we are good to go with the collecting process. We think this will be a great step to help make the campus more sustainable and less dependent of electricity. Cutting back on the use of light alone will potentially save the school an incredible amount of money each year. Even if our recommendations only save one percent of electricity use that is thousands of dollars that could then go straight back to motion sensor light switches, for example. Overall we are very pleased with where our project is now. Collecting the light data and putting it in a readable format are the next two sets in our project.

RECYCLING COMPANIES, ART FOR THE EARTH, AND MORE


Oxy’s current recycling company collects the contents of our bins for no fee. They do this in hopes that such a large institution will provide them with a large amount of recyclable products, which they will be able to use for a profit. Unfortunately, this means that the company is pretty cheap and does not sort through our bins. If a non-recyclable item (including the take out containers from the marketplace!) is in one of the bins, the company will trash the entire bin instead of sorting through it. Because many Oxy students aren’t aware of the restrictions for recyclables, many of our bins are contaminated and are never recycled. It has gotten to a point where our current company is thinking of dropping us because they have to throw out so many of our bins anyways.

Towards the beginning of the semester, our group met with Bruce Steele, head of Facilities. We discussed our current recycling system and learned just how inefficient it is. Bruce seemed very interested in finding an alternative that is more eco-friendly, but it is difficult to find a company that fits the college’s needs perfectly. After talking to him about the college’s needs, we decided to do some research on our own of some of the nearby recycling companies. We plan to collect information and then present it to Bruce. Hopefully we can work out a more efficient recycling system for the school!

One of the ways we began this research was by attending a meeting with other concerned Oxy students with the Los Angeles Bureau of Sanitation. We met with Environmental Specialist, Jinderpal Bhandal, who hoped to do a waste audit of Occidental to help asses how much we throw away, how much we recycle, and how we go about these actions. Unfortunately, due to the lack of data on waste at Oxy, this was difficult to do and we realized that it has been many years since we collected any data on our recycling or trash disposal. Because of this, unfortunately Mr. Bhandal was not able to do a complete waste assessment of our campus. However, we able to give him some rough estimates and he walked around the campus to observe some of our bins and disposal sites. Mr. Bhandal suggested that Oxy adopt a single-stream recycling program. This means that we would use one company for all of our recycling needs. Currently, we use a company called SoCal Recyclers who, although they collect our recycling for free, only collects CRV items which they can earn profits from. This presents a problem, as Oxy students don’t often distinguish between CRV and non-CRV items. However, if we were to have a company that collected both, the restrictions on what we can recycle would be greatly reduced. In addition to this, the task of separating would become less necessary and we would be able to save gas and time by only have one company come to pick up everything.

While Mr. Bhandal was not able to do a full assessment of Oxy’s system, he did give us some materials that were helpful. We were given a book that contained information on locating an efficient recycler for larger businesses (like a college campus) and included a list of questions to ask, in addition to a list of local recyclers. We are currently in the process of narrowing down this group, as well as doing research on our own, in the hopes of compiling a list of about three recyclers that we think would best suit Oxy’s needs. The booklet we were given had a list of about 20 recyclers and so far we have narrowed down that list to all companies within 10 miles of Oxy. We are also waiting to hear back from Mr. Bhandal for a more comprehensive and up-to-date list of local recyclers.

In addition to this, April signifies the beginning of World Earth Month. Every year, students from our class put up presentations and exhibits on the quad on April 22nd (Earth Day). This year, we're going to have a wide variety of activities from transportation education to recycling. Our group has decided to focus on activities that will really integrate the Oxy community into the current recyling program on campus, including spreading awareness, art competitions and demonstrations. The art competition is on the theme of recycling, with a mandate that one of the components of the piece be recycled. We will also be having competitions to sort recyclables and signable pledges to commit to begin recycling this month.

--Sara, Rachel, and Marisha

Thursday, February 10, 2011

Location: Eagle Rock and York

Time: 2:00

Street Width: 3 lanes plus a turn lane on one side, 2 lanes plus a bike lane on the other.

Bike Lanes or Signage: Bike lane only on one side. Sign for bike lane under speed limit sign.

Street Median Landscaping: Some trees and birds of paradise flowers on the median and by the right turn lane.

Sidewalk Amenities: Covered bus stop, newspaper dispensers

Pedestrian Safety Infrastructure: Multiple crosswalks, most of which are protected. Wide sidewalks, but bikes are on one of the sidewalk, which can be dangerous for pedestrians.

Posted Speed Limit: 35 mph

Traffic Count: 32 cars per minute

Bike Count: .5 per minute

Pedestrian Count: .5 per minute

Pedestrian Behavior Observation: Lots of people with groceries. Everyone uses crosswalks and they do not seem to be rushing. There are several high school students with backpacks.

Car Behavior Observation: Some speeding. Cars seem impatient at turns, which can be dangerous for pedestrians at crosswalks.

Noise and Feel of Being Pedestrian: Very loud noises, which is overwhelming. The trees are pretty but the area is not inviting and there is nowhere to sit other than two bus stops.

Suggestions to Improve Streets: Add a bike lane to the other side of the street. Make right turns "no turn on right" to protect pedestrians at crosswalks. Add seating areas for pedestrians.

Rachel and Brian

York and Avenue 50

Upon observing the intersection of York and Avenue 50 at 1:55 pm on February 3rd we found the following:

At the intersection, there is a lane of traffic in each direction, plus two turn lanes. There is no street median. The speed limit on York is 35 mph, and cars generally followed the speed limit when in the proximity of the intersection, with some speeding up on either side. Bike lanes are existent on York, but are not well marked within the intersection.

In the intersection, the crosswalks are wide and well marked, and there are crossing signals. It appeared that drivers were conscious of crossing pedestrians.


Sidewalk amenities include benches, bike racks, and a few private patio chairs in front of Café de Leche. There are scattered street trees along the sidewalk. We found it interesting that one our side of the street there was a protected/covered bus stop, however there was only an unprotected bench on the other side- the side in the sun at this time of the afternoon.


We performed three traffic, bike and pedestrian counts for a period of three minutes each. We found that an average of 61 cars moved through the intersection during that time, as well as 1 bike and 4 pedestrians. Most pedestrians were moving directly from their cars into businesses on the street, and used the crosswalks and obeyed traffic signals if they needed to cross the street. Most people were walking alone, and similarly driving alone to their destinations.


Bike lanes are a new addition to York, however in our observations we felt that they were placed dangerously next to rows of parked cars that had to move through the bike lanes to park.

We found that sitting at the intersection was very noisy and distracting. We did more car watching than people watching, although Café do Leche was busy with people entering and exiting the whole time we were there.


















Suggestions for improving the street:
Place the bike lanes between parked cars and sidewalk, so that they are protected from fast moving cars on the street.
More public seating along the sidewalk and outside of businesses and restaurants.
Parking in the rear of businesses instead of on the street, this could free up space for a bike lane and the widening of sidewalks.

Kelsey and Grey

Location: Eagle Rock Blvd btw/ Corliss and Westdale







Street Observations:

Time: 2:00-2:30 pm

Street width: 2 car lanes and one bike lane, bike lanes outside parked cars


Bike lanes and signage: Yes, sign encouraging share the road

Street median landscaping: Median with trees, but broken up a lot down the street
Sidewalk amenities: no benches, few bus stops and no benches for bus stops, sidewalks not shaded, wide sidewalk

Posted speed limit: 35 mph, not clearly visible from all angles and cars were definitely traveling faster than that

Traffic count: On average 36.25 cars per 2 minutes

Bike count: On average, 2.67 bikers per 5 minutes

Pedestrian count: 4 pedestrians per 5 minutes

Pedestrian behavior: A lot of jaywalking

Car behavior: Fast, but relaxed. There was no angry driving or erratic maneuvers.



Noise and feel of being a pedestrian: Very loud, not aesthetically pleasing, not clean. There was trash on the ground when there was a trash can about 2 feet away

Suggestions: Clean up the streets, benches at bus stops, more plants



By Sara and Drake








York Roundabout Street Observation:


Location:

York Roundabout

Time of observation:

1:55 PM

Street width (number of car lanes)

4

Bike lanes or signage:

Bike lane on one side of road

Street median landscaping:

Roundabout is landscaped but leads onto large main street, all other areas are privately landscaped by shops or restaurants.

Sidewalk amenities (protected bus stops, benches, street trees etc):

There's a tree line but not much else- no bus stops observed.

Pedestrian safety infrastructure (crosswalks, lights, stop signs etc) posted speed limit:

Speed Limit: 35mph

Other Observations: Wide sidewalks not much crosswalks, not very many streetlights, busy transit roads but not a place people stop on their own

Traffic Count (cars/ trucks passing in both directions per minute)

Raw Data:

Observation Number

Pedestrians

Cars

Buses

Bikes

1

0

21

0

1

2

0

30

1

0

3

1

32

0

1

Average:

Cars/minute: 9.22

Bikes/minute: .22

Pedestrians/minute:

Pedestrian behavior observation (people crossing not at crosswalks/ lights; lingering on sidewalks:

Most pedestrians were heading towards Starbucks and CVS, not generally walking around the area. Crosswalks were only accessible on the very ends of the block, problematic because of the length of the block. There were no visible stop signs for the road.

Car behavior observation noise and "feel" of being pedestrian:

The sidewalk is wide and mostly empty, and cars are a safe distance away.

With the exception of the business attracted by the CVS and Starbucks, the area seems to be primarily traversed as a go-between. Traffic was either heading towards the residential area nearby or towards the next main junction, not stopping in the general area.

Other observations:

The area is likely utilized as more of a destination during the weekends for individuals visiting the CVS, Starbucks, or L&L Hawaiian Restaurant. However, the roads and parking lots set the character for the area as one to be driven to.

Most of the area in the region is parking space that could be used as some kind of community gathering space during the weekends. Holding a farmers’ market in the area may attract the local residents while stimulating the local economy. Building more community in the area could benefit local residents, and help to stem the emphasis on car usage.

Suggestions to improve streets:

1. The area can be turned into a street market with food and shops if cordoned off on Sundays due to large parking lots and open space available.

2. Bike lanes can be expanded because currently it’s being used as a turning lane.

3. Instead of having fences around establishments (which were mostly small businesses) greenery can be introduced to make it more community based.

4. The streets behind the area need to have more trees/ shade

5. Change accessibility to CVS and Starbucks to be more pedestrian-friendly

6. Minimize parking spaces because there isn’t much patronage for the restaurants

7. Starbucks can have another entry from the street itself instead of only through the parking lot to encourage more street traffic.

Marisha and Dimitri

Wednesday, February 9, 2011

Eagle Rock and York
















Location: Between the streets of 46th and Hazelwood on York Blvd.

Time of Observation: 1:45pm

Street Width (number of car lanes): It is a two lane road with a middle turning lane.

Bike lanes and signage: There are two bike lanes one for each car lane, there is also plenty of signage to identify the bike lanes. These signs are not very big though.

Pedestrian safety infrastructure (crosswalks, lights, stop signs, etc.): There is a crosswalk and traffic light at the intersection of 46th and York, as well as a stop sign at where Hazelwood meets York.

Posted Speed limit: 35 mph sign located at the intersection of 46th and York.

Traffic Count: 21.33 vehicles per minute
Bike Count: 0.33 bikes per minutes

Pedestrian Count: 4.3 pedestrians per minute

Pedestrian behavior observations: Overall there were very few pedestrians in the area walking and using the sidewalks. We did not observe people not crossing at proper crosswalks but rather the opposite. We followed a man who walked down the street and then back up the other side to get into his car.
Car Behavior Observation: We wittnessed the majority of the cars speeding past and not obeying the speed limit. But, when we did try to cross the street at a non designsated crosswalk both sides of traffic stopped to let us cross. I thought it was a very nice thing and did not expect it to happen.

Noise and Feel of the area: There was a lot of green space along the sidewalks providing ample amount of shape and on a hot day like that it felt great. The sidewalks themselves were not in the best condition though; they need some work. During the time we spent out on the street we saw three different patrol cars drive by and definitly added to the safe feeling of the location. The worst part of the experience was the noise. The amount of cars driving by created a lot of noise and was not very pleasent.

Improvement Suggestions: A crosswalk could be placed at the intersection of Hazelwood and York. This was the intersection where we crossed and traffic stopped. The addition of trashcans at some locations along the sidewalks would help cut down on the amount of trash along the street and sidewalk.
BY: Tyler Naftz and Erika Albert

Monday, November 29, 2010

Reclaiming Recycling at Oxy

As many of my fellow classmates have noted in their blogs, the current recycling program at our college is uninspiring and unacceptable for any university, let alone one that claims its school colors to be black, orange and "green" on the front page of its website. As a member of the group working on raising awareness and improving recycling on our campus, I have been given an eye-opening lesson into the disfunction that presently is our on-campus recycling system. As others in my group have mentioned, many popular and perfectly recyclable items (all to-go containers, Green Bean plastic cups, etc) on campus are not accepted by Oxy's designated recycling company, SoCal Recycling. Not only does this company not recycle these items but if a bag of recycling contains to many of these types of materials, then they will simply throw the whole bag away. It is shameful and hypocritical that Oxy calls itself a "green oasis" in urban Los Angeles and yet neglects as basic a sustainability principle as recycling by selecting a bare-bones recycling partnership with a company that only takes CRV materials. We can and need to do better! Luckily there are many within our faculty, staff and student body who want to do the right thing and support a top-teir recycling program at our college. Both Housing and Facilities go above and beyond in their efforts to make our current broken system work as best they can. We need further student engagement in the disposal of our own personal waste and stronger leadership at the administrative level to guide our school toward the goal of environmental sustainability. We cannot simply rest on our school's historic progressive ideals and actions. We NEED a 21st-century recycling system at our school if Oxy is going to remain a leader in environmental advocacy and social justice.

Thursday, November 11, 2010

waste and recyling (by alex)

(posted on behalf of alex)

Being a part of the recycling group, I paid special attention to the Disposal section. Everyone else has talked a lot about the book so I have decided to share a little story with you that relates to the book. I hope you enjoy:

I was having a nice Socratic dialogue with one of my friends a few weeks ago about recycling and how horrible Oxy’s program is. He shared the frustration with me but admitted that he neither recycled nor put his garbage in the bins. He simply leaves it out. My immediate reaction was, naturally, “wow, you’re a bad person” (I’m keeping this PG). But when he explained to me his reasoning, I found it to be very profound and interesting. He doesn’t recycle or throw away his trash because proper placement of discarded items is not the issue. For the most part (that is, excluding hippies like us), people have disposal services for sanitation and to preserve order. If we did not have these services, people would just throw trash on the street and we would have cities flooded with garbage (if you don’t believe me, read about the Five Points neighborhood in the early 19th century). We can agree, then, that these services are a good because we maintain (for the most part) clean, healthy, and orderly environments. The consequence of this, however, is that we simply put our trash in a bin and then it becomes someone else’s problem and no longer our responsibility. By hiding our trash in a bin, it gets taken to the landfill which is the area we have designated to pollute instead of our home. Leonard talks about the host of environmental problems there, including toxics seeping into the groundwater, the excess of methane gas, and the use of incinerators. But these are for the most part inconsequential for us. Once we put them in the bin they are out of sight, out of mind. Back to my friend, he pollutes the campus to counter this, to put the consequences of trash “in sight and in mind”. He sees his actions as a form of culture jamming, whereby someone sees the trash and so is forced, even if only for a second, to consider pollution and how trash is affecting their life.

Is he justified in doing this? You tell me. If only one person is doing it then it doesn’t make a whole lot of difference. But I think this story does force you to ask some questions about the production system as a whole that Leonard outlines in her book. Particularly, it asks us to reshape our perception of personal environmental responsibility. I hope this picks at your brain a little bit, and I hope that maybe we can one day figure out a way to solve this problem.

more thoughts on recycling (by alex)

(posted on behalf of alex)

I have been working with the recycling group to improve the Oxy’s recycling program. I’m sure you have read my other group members posts so I will try not to be too repetitive, but we can’t emphasize enough how regressive the system is here. The company that we have now, SoCal Recycling, exists as a for-profit company. Oxy uses them because their services are free. We throw things into the bin, they pick them up and sell them back for money. We do this because it is the easiest and cheapest solution. But, as we tend to see when it comes to environmental issues, that mentality is not quite appropriate. Because Oxy has taken no steps to educate us, the students, on their recycling policy, we continue to recycle the way we do at home, which at least where I’m from is just throwing everything into one bin and letting the company take care of it. Because most of us continue to do this at Oxy, SoCal is considering dropping us because it so much of what we attempt to recycle is to them only considered trash.
It has been my job to contact outside companies. When I spoke to SCR, they told me that they only take CRVs (and on a side note offered to pick up out paper recycling as long as we had a machine that would bale it. Lol). I spoke to the city’s official recycling company and they weren’t very helpful. Apparently LA has the best recycling program in the country, but the woman I talked to wasn’t sure if they could pick ours up or how much it would cost. They then sent us a list of other companies to look at without giving us a quote.
As you can see changing the recycling policy at Oxy is very challenging. While we have gotten the ball rolling, I plan to continue this project next semester and I hope some of you will join us. In the meantime, get the word out to your friends while we are getting the signs up. Hopefully when people find out how ridiculous it is they will start to voice their discontent.

Apathy

I feel that people are becoming more aware of the problems that discourage a sustainable evironment. This is a very frusturating aspect to making the world a better place for everyone. A lot of people just feel that it is not their responsiblity and take an apathetic stance toward recycling and other initiatives. If we could start small and take baby steps in the directions of sustainability we could accomplish a lot. Force feeding things like energy reduction and housing materials is not a effective way to get the point across. There needs to be a mass movement toward cooperation to accomplish sustainable development. A reduction in red tape politics at the local and national level would also increase the support for sustainable living. Jumping through hoops is the biggest obstacle for groups wanting change. Just facing the political side of this project posses a threatening barrier for many people wanting to contribute leading them to become apathetic toward the entire problem we all face.

School lighting

The project is going well. We are now in the process of collecting the data we need to submit our recommendation. To do this we will look at the amount of lumens are being used both in the classroom/offices and the hallways of Fowler Hall. We think that too much light is being used and we feel that if some of the light bulbs were removed from rooms and hallways the school could save a lot on electricity costs. As part of our side project we are laminating signs to be placed next to the computers to remind users to turn them off when not in use. Our plan is straight forward and could effectively save the school some serious cash.

Composting Details

Like Anna said, we have been working on purchasing a unit that would dehydrate most of our pre and post-consumer food waste. Because she gave a great overview of the project I will talk about some more specific aspects of what we have found out.

One thing that we have been interested in while researching the dehydrating unit is what type of capacity it has for compostable dishware. We thought it would be excellent if the machine could not only reduce our food waste, but also our waste from the Green Bean, the Cooler and the Marketplace for take home containers. Unfortunately, it looks like for each batch of food that is “cooked” or dehydrated, only 20% of it can be compostable dishware, such as the cups that we use in the Green Bean. Any type of corn-based silverware could not go in the machine because that would need to be chipped as it is almost completely dehydrated already. We would need to get another machine in order handle compostables, or research further about having compostables picked up, which would be a great idea for a project in later semesters.

After talking to Amy Munoz we realized there were some other things to take into consideration that we had not previously considered. She mentioned that finding space to put the machine could be problematic. Even though it is not that huge, Amy said that the marketplace is pretty much maxed out on space right now. If we cannot fit it in the dish room, moving pre and post consumer food waste is going to be more difficult if it has to go downstairs for example. She also had us think about how difficult this would be for the staff, she pointed out that so many people have been working for us for over ten years so re-training for a whole new system can be difficult. However, she said that if this is going to make things easier, than it will be much better received. Her ideas were really helpful in making us think about things we would not have otherwise. She was also very supportive and excited about the idea, which Anna and I found really promising.

Limitation and hopes for the future

Especially after coming from 6 months abroad, I have time and time again realized that the Oxy culture does not really promote the sustainability and diversity values that it often totes. Though huge steps have been made with plans for solar energy and local/organic foods offered in the marketplace, it is apparent to me that there is a general apathy among students and faculty overall. In the current context of economic hard times and financial crunch, the need to invest in cost-saving long term costs is important. On the other hand, creating a mechanism to "green" our campus's energy use is a bit futile, since energy use is increased with more students, more appliances per student and increased technology used in classrooms throughout disciplines. By shifting our focus to cost-saving and energy reduction projects, we can create significant change!

--Kathryn Griffith

Composting Update

Elizabeth and I have been working to try and implement a composting device in the marketplace. The appliance we've been looking at is called the eCorect, which is a copier sized machine that dehydrates both pre and post consumer waste and can take up to 220 pounds of waste per day. After a cycle of 12-18 hours the machine produces a dirt-like substance that can be used on the Oxy grounds. Theoretically, this machine could eliminate up to 95% of Oxy's food waste. The end result is not quite a compost, but could be if we added wood chips or something similar to the machine, however it is still entirely usable.
We have met with Bruce Steele, who was actually the one who recommended this machine, Amy Munoz, the marketplace manager, as well as Steve Remeyer, a representative from the company that sells the eCorect.
We walked around the market place with Steve and looked at the logistics of where the eCorect could be placed, and asked him questions about odor, restrictions on what can be put into the machine, etc. Steve seemed confident that if we were approved by the school to go forward with this project the machine could be installed very quickly; it really only needs to be plugged in.
Amy Munoz is supportive of the project, as it would reduce our food waste and thus the cost of food waste removal. It would also increase the level of sustainability in marketplace food practices.
One conern we had was the amount of power that would potentially be used, however the power usage is low, and probably would have a lower carbon foot print than the amount of energy used to transport waste off campus.
Currently we are working to set up a time that works for us to again meet with Steve, the ecorect company representative at a facility that currently has an operating eCorect machine. Hopefully Bruce Steele, possibly Amy Munoz and Michael Stephens will also accompany us on this trip.

-Anna D.

greener bean update (by raquel)

{on behalf of raquel)

So as previously mentioned, we have indeed run into a few snags along the path of completing our project for the semester. Something that I have noticed from taking a class like this and also from trying to implement change is that, no one dislikes the idea of green initiatives- the problem is getting people who care enough to do something about it. It is easy for us to sit in a classroom and talk about all the things we would like to fix but we all know that talking and doing are two completely different things. Living amongst self-proclaimed liberals who “care deeply about the environment” yet throw away recycling because the bin is 10 ft further, keep all the lights on at home 24 hours a day, let the shower heat up for 10 minutes, and more, it becomes quite evident that being “green” is a trend. This sort of behavior is what Occidental engages in but on a much larger scale. It is frustrating to think about but it is in fact the case, Occidental College is a business who like most other businesses, cares more about their profits and reputation then their global impact. I think we can all agree that decreasing Oxy’s carbon footprint, isn’t the issue closest to the hearts of the those with the most leverage to do so. All this said, it is no surprise to me whatsoever that many of us have run into problems in our attempts to make what other people would consider, miniscule changes.

As Sarah said, we had received the go ahead in ordering mugs and plates for the Green Bean only to be halted by a minor technicality. I think that the most frustrating thing about this scenario has to be knowing that if this was something that the college or campus dining considered important, it would be completed instantly. But I will say that after four years at Oxy I would have probably passed out if things had run smoothly. All this said, we have completed our Green Bean Green Guide, which is ironic because its printed on paper, but anyways, with suggestions on how to make small changes that can help reduce waste. I do feel good about this project though because I do know that since I will continue to manage the Green Bean through graduation in May, it will be completed. Basically at this point all we need is the Green light (pun intended) from the inspector and we will be ready to use the mugs.
--Raquel Carrion